The "Committee of Surveillance" (Comité de Surveillance) referred to various local bodies established during the French Revolution, tasked with enforcing revolutionary laws and monitoring activities deemed counter-revolutionary. These committees emerged around March 1793, a period marked by increasing internal and external pressures on the revolutionary government. Composed of local citizens or "patriots" loyal to the revolutionary cause, Committee members were often fervent supporters of the radical Jacobin faction. Their primary function included the surveillance (as their name suggests) of individuals suspected of anti-revolutionary activities, hoarding goods, or failing to support the revolutionary government. Committees could arrest and interrogate suspects, leading to imprisonment or referral to revolutionary tribunals. The members of these committees were instrumental in implementing the "Law of Suspects" (implemented on 17 September 1793), which broadened the scope of actions considered traitorous or counter-revolutionary. Under this law, a wide array of individuals, from nobles to moderate Republicans, faced increased scrutiny and potential detention. The expansive discretion allowed by this law made the Committee of Surveillance a powerful local institution, with significant impact on daily life and societal dynamics. More than mere enforcement bodies, these committees also played a role in the politics of surveillance and denunciation. Numerous local disputes settled through the revolutionary lens, as accusations could sometimes stem from personal grievances rather than genuine counter-revolutionary behavior. They also monitored marketplaces to ensure price controls and combat hoarding—aims of the wartime economy. The structure and influence of these committees varied significantly across different regions. In places of strong revolutionary fervor, they operated with greater autonomy and intensity, whereas in less radical areas, their presence was more subdued. Their activities sometimes overlapped with those of other revolutionary institutions, such as the Revolutionary Tribunals and the Committee of Public Safety. This overlapping jurisdiction occasionally led to confusion and power struggles. The legacy of the Committee of Surveillance reflects the broader dynamics of the Revolution—a continuous tension between revolutionary ideals and the practical necessities of governance and social control. Their existence underscores the extent to which the Revolution permeated everyday life, and how local institutions could wield considerable power in shaping the pace and direction of revolutionary change.