Esc

Type to search every glossary

Document

Law of Suspects

The law that filled the prisons of the Terror

Voted by the National Convention on 17 September 1793, the Law of Suspects ordered the immediate arrest of every “suspect” still at liberty, and defined suspects so broadly — partisans of tyranny or federalism, people refused a certificate of civism, former nobles and relatives of émigrés who had not constantly shown their attachment to the Revolution — that almost anyone could fall under it. Local surveillance committees drew up the lists and signed the warrants, and the prisons filled: by the usual estimates, between 300,000 and half a million people were held during the Terror. It remained the legal backbone of the Terror until the fall of Robespierre.

Adopted
17 September 1793
A Tuesday, twelve days after terror was made “the order of the day”
In the glossary's timeline: marker
Key: a turning point
In the glossary's timeline: tone
Danger: death and violence
Place
Paris
the Tuileries, where the Convention sat
Adopted by
National Convention
on a report of its Committee of Legislation
Presented by
Merlin de Douai
known ever after as “Merlin-Suspects”
Text
10articles
suspects held “until the peace” (Art. 7)
Suspects
6categories
listed in Article 2
Enforced by
Surveillance committees
in every commune and section, since March 1793
Detained
≈ 500,000people
the usual upper estimate for the whole Terror; others say 300,000

Key articles

  1. Art. 1

    Immediately after the publication of this decree, all suspects who are on the territory of the Republic and who are still at liberty shall be placed under arrest.

    Not a charge but a status: a suspect was arrested for what he was thought to be, not for anything he had done.

  2. Art. 2

    The following are deemed suspects: 1. those who, by their conduct, their connections, their words or their writings, have shown themselves partisans of tyranny or of federalism and enemies of liberty; 2. those who cannot justify, in the manner prescribed by the decree of 21 March last, their means of existence and the performance of their civic duties; 3. those who have been refused certificates of civism; 4. public officials suspended or dismissed from their functions by the National Convention or by its commissioners, and not reinstated […]; 5. those former nobles, together with the husbands, wives, fathers, mothers, sons or daughters, brothers or sisters, and agents of émigrés, who have not constantly shown their attachment to the Revolution; 6. those who emigrated between 1 July 1789 and the publication of the decree of 30 March–8 April 1792, even though they returned to France within the time fixed by that decree, or earlier.

    Six categories, most of them defined by opinions, family or past rather than by acts; “federalism” meant the revolts that followed the fall of the Girondins.

  3. Art. 3

    The surveillance committees established under the decree of 21 March last, or those that have replaced them […], are charged with drawing up, each in its district, the list of suspects, with issuing arrest warrants against them and with having seals placed on their papers.

    Local committees of ordinary citizens, not judges, decided who was arrested; Article 4 required seven members and an absolute majority.

  4. Art. 7

    The detainees may have brought into these buildings the furniture that is absolutely necessary to them; they shall remain there under guard until the peace.

    No trial and no term: suspects were to be held until the war was over, and Article 8 made them pay for their own guards.

  5. Art. 10

    The civil and criminal courts may, if need be, have kept under arrest as suspects, and sent to the houses of detention named above, those accused of offences against whom it is declared that there are no grounds for prosecution, or who are acquitted of the charges brought against them.

    Even an acquittal was no longer a way out.

Timeline

  1. 21 Mar 1793
    The Convention sets up a surveillance committee in every commune, at first to watch foreigners
  2. 5 Sep
    Terror, the order of the day — sans-culottes invade the Convention, which votes a revolutionary army
  3. 17 Sep
    Voted — the Convention adopts the ten articles presented by Merlin de Douai
  4. Oct
    The Paris Commune, urged on by Chaumette, lists further signs by which to know a suspect
  5. Dec
    In Le Vieux Cordelier, Desmoulins calls for a “committee of clemency”
  6. Feb–Mar 1794
    The Ventôse decrees provide for suspects’ property to go to poor patriots
  7. 10 Jun
    Law of 22 Prairial — the Revolutionary Tribunal is left only acquittal or death
  8. 27 Jul
    Robespierre falls; within weeks the prisons begin to empty

People involved

Rapporteur Philippe-Antoine Merlin de Douai Presented the law for the Committee of Legislation; later a minister and a Director
Procureur of the Paris Commune Pierre-Gaspard Chaumette Widened the signs of a suspect in October 1793; guillotined in April 1794
Committee of Public Safety Maximilien Robespierre Defended the Terror to the end; fell on 9 Thermidor Committee of Public Safety Louis Antoine de Saint-Just Proposed the Ventôse decrees on suspects’ property Journalist Camille Desmoulins Pleaded for the suspects in Le Vieux Cordelier; guillotined on 5 April 1794

Most of those who drew up the lists and made the arrests were local men on the surveillance committees, whose names history has seldom kept.

Terror, the order of the day

How the law came about

By the late summer of 1793 the Republic was at war with most of Europe and with rebels at home. The Vendée had risen in March; after the leading Girondins were expelled from the Convention in June, Lyon, Marseille, Bordeaux and other cities had turned against Paris in what the Montagnards called “federalism”; and at the end of August the royalists of Toulon handed the port and its fleet to the British. In Paris bread was scarce and dear. On 23 August the Convention decreed the levée en masse, putting every French citizen at the service of the war.

At the Jacobin Club speakers had been calling for terror for days. On 5 September crowds of sans-culottes, led by the Paris Commune, marched on the Convention demanding bread and action against the Republic’s enemies within. The deputies gave way. They voted to raise a revolutionary army to carry the Revolution into the countryside, and Bertrand Barère, speaking for the Committee of Public Safety, took up the cry: “Let us make terror the order of the day.” Twelve days later, on 17 September, Philippe-Antoine Merlin de Douai presented a decree on suspects on behalf of the Committee of Legislation, and the Convention adopted it.

Who was a suspect

Six categories and a certificate

The first article ordered the arrest, at once, of every suspect still at liberty. The second said who they were, in six categories: partisans of tyranny or federalism, known by their conduct, their connections, their words or their writings; people who could not account for their means of living and the performance of their civic duties; anyone who had been refused a certificate of civism, the paper by which a commune vouched for a citizen’s patriotism; dismissed officials; former nobles and relatives of émigrés who had not “constantly” shown their attachment to the Revolution; and émigrés who had come home.

Most of these were not crimes. They described a person’s opinions, family, friends or past, and they left the judgment to those who applied the law. In October the Paris Commune, urged on by its procureur, Pierre-Gaspard Chaumette, published its own list of signs by which a suspect could be known, among them “those who, having done nothing against liberty, have also done nothing for it”. Four years earlier the Declaration of the Rights of Man had promised that no one could be arrested except in the cases determined by law, and that everyone was presumed innocent. The Law of Suspects kept to the letter of the first promise, since it was itself the law, and turned the second on its head: now the suspect had to prove his civic virtue.

Committees and prisons

Held until the peace

The law was enforced by the surveillance committees, set up in March 1793 in every commune and in each section of the large towns. They drew up the lists, signed the warrants and sealed the suspects’ papers, then sent the names and the reasons for each arrest to the Committee of General Security in Paris, the Convention’s police committee. Suspects were to be held “until the peace”, at their own expense.

The prisons filled quickly. In Paris the old ones were soon not enough, and former convents, colleges and palaces were turned into jails, among them the Luxembourg, the Carmelite convent in the rue de Vaugirard and Port-Royal, renamed Port-Libre. Across France, by the usual estimates, between 300,000 and half a million people were held as suspects during the Terror, many of them for months, and thousands died in custody. Most never came to trial. The courts that did judge, the Revolutionary Tribunal in Paris and the courts and commissions in the provinces, passed some 17,000 death sentences between them, most of them for rebellion or treason, as told in What was the Terror?

“Open the prisons”

From clemency to Prairial

By the winter the prisons had become a political question. In December 1793 Camille Desmoulins, an old schoolfriend of Robespierre, took up the suspects’ cause in his newspaper, Le Vieux Cordelier.

“Open the prisons to those two hundred thousand citizens whom you call suspects.”
— Camille Desmoulins, Le Vieux Cordelier, no. 4, December 1793

He asked for a “committee of clemency” to examine their cases. Robespierre at first shielded him, then broke with him, and on 5 April 1794 Desmoulins went to the guillotine with Danton and the other “Indulgents”. The Committee of Public Safety went the other way. In February and March 1794 the Ventôse decrees, proposed by Saint-Just, provided for the property of suspects recognised as enemies of the Revolution to be seized and given to poor patriots; they were never really applied. On 10 June the Law of 22 Prairial widened the definition of the enemies of the people still further, abolished defence counsel before the Revolutionary Tribunal and left it a single penalty, death.

From suspicion to Thermidor
  1. Surveillance committees 21 Mar 1793
  2. Terror, the order of the day 5 Sep 1793
  3. Law of Suspects 17 Sep 1793
  4. Law of 22 Prairial 10 Jun 1794
  5. Fall of Robespierre 27 Jul 1794

In nine months the Terror went from arrest on suspicion to judgment without defence.

After the fall of Robespierre on 9 Thermidor (27 July 1794), the committees began releasing suspects by the thousand, and the law that had made them suspects fell out of use. Merlin de Douai went on to serve the Directory as minister of justice and then as one of its five Directors.

Why it matters

The Law of Suspects turned the Terror from a string of emergency measures into a system. It set up no court and passed no sentence, but by making suspicion itself a ground for arrest, and by putting the power to arrest in the hands of thousands of local committees, it placed much of France under watch. Its name became a byword for laws that punish people for who they are or what they might think: in 1858, after an attempt on the life of Napoleon III, the Second Empire’s law of general security was at once nicknamed a new “law of suspects”.

Sources

  1. Greer, D. The Incidence of the Terror during the French Revolution: A Statistical Interpretation. Cambridge, Mass., 1935.
  2. Palmer, R. R. Twelve Who Ruled: The Committee of Public Safety during the Terror. Princeton, 1941.
  3. Lefebvre, G. La Révolution française. Paris, 1951.
  4. Doyle, W. The Oxford History of the French Revolution. Oxford, 1989.
  5. Gough, H. The Terror in the French Revolution. Basingstoke, 1998.
  6. Martin, J.-C. Violence et Révolution: Essai sur la naissance d'un mythe national. Paris, 2006.
  7. Tackett, T. The Coming of the Terror in the French Revolution. Cambridge, Mass., 2015.